Comments for Adventures of an Eternal Optimist http://eternaloptimist.wordpress.com Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:39:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU Comment on Catalyst Epiphany #1 by Mark Dixon http://eternaloptimist.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/catalyst-epiphany-1/#comment-17921 Mark Dixon Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:20:45 +0000 http://eternaloptimist.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-17921 Very well stated. I too was amazed how Nick has such broad control and how the company ignored many warning signals. Very well stated. I too was amazed how Nick has such broad control and how the company ignored many warning signals.

]]> Comment on Catalyst Epiphany #1 by Matt Flynn http://eternaloptimist.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/catalyst-epiphany-1/#comment-17916 Matt Flynn Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:43:16 +0000 http://eternaloptimist.wordpress.com/?p=323#comment-17916 Interesting. Thanks Pamela. I've been calling your point #1 "IT transparency" though I admit that I haven't felt it resonate strongly with people in the field. I think this post is particularly important amongst the trend to bash GRC as having importance in driving IdM. I don't know why the discussion of GRC is threatening - I think it's similar to an anti-FUD campaign. But this story shows the real underlying issue. This is why we started talking about GRC in reference to IdM. Interesting. Thanks Pamela. I’ve been calling your point #1 “IT transparency” though I admit that I haven’t felt it resonate strongly with people in the field.

I think this post is particularly important amongst the trend to bash GRC as having importance in driving IdM. I don’t know why the discussion of GRC is threatening - I think it’s similar to an anti-FUD campaign.

But this story shows the real underlying issue. This is why we started talking about GRC in reference to IdM.

]]>